Learning from Applications to Columbia’s Master’s Programs in Environmental Sustainability
Since its establishment, I have reviewed over 3000 applications to SIPA’s MPA in Environment Science and Policy program, founded in 2002, and more than 4,000 applications to SPS’s MS in Sustainability Management program, founded in 2010. These programs were developed in partnership with Columbia’s Earth Institute, now part of the Climate School, and I have been involved in their creation and direction. I review every application submitted because, ultimately, the success of the students is my responsibility. Reviewing the applications provides valuable insights into the emerging profession of sustainability policy and management.
When designing the curriculum for both programs, we consider three main factors: intellectual integrity and coherence, the feedback from alumni and employers, and the input from current students. Our goal is to develop professions, and as such, our curriculum needs to be both practical and intellectually rigorous. We value the input of our applicants, as they often provide insights into the skills they believe are essential for effective professionals in the field of sustainability policy and management.
The MPA in Environmental Science and Policy program follows a traditional public administration/public policy degree structure. It is a demanding 54-point, 3-semester program that starts in May and is completed the following May. The curriculum is specifically designed for full-time commitment, with only 4 electives. On the other hand, the MS in Sustainability Management program offers more flexibility, with only 2 of the 12 courses being required. Approximately 60% of the students in this program work full-time and attend evening classes. Students have the flexibility to shape their program according to their professional and intellectual interests. While the programs have different designs, their curricula overlap, and the applicants are surprisingly similar.
One notable observation from the applications I review is the absence of hopelessness or despair among the applicants. Despite their deep concerns about the environment and the urgency they feel about making a positive impact, they demonstrate a sense of mission and determination. They are passionate about addressing the challenges facing the planet and are eager to acquire the skills and knowledge necessary to drive change. The applicants are part of a generation that is entrepreneurial and driven by a sense of purpose, seeking to build a sustainable future.
The growth of environmental studies at the undergraduate level has had a significant impact on the perspectives of applicants, many of whom have studied in related fields. As a result, the curriculum for master’s programs in environmental sustainability must continuously evolve to meet the changing demands of the field.
Our faculty, comprised of working professionals and research scientists, are responsive to the demand for specific analytic tools with marketplace demand. The focus on practical and career-oriented skills is evident in the choice of courses on green finance, sustainability metrics, and corporate sustainability reporting.
The final lesson learned from the applications and the students themselves is their sense of community and inclusivity. The students are mission-driven and see the complexities of environmental challenges as requiring a team-based approach. They actively participate in various sustainability-related groups and clubs, fostering a sense of belonging and shared purpose within the community.
In conclusion, the applications to Columbia’s Master’s Programs in Environmental Sustainability have provided valuable insights into the emergence of the profession and the characteristics of the students entering the field. They are motivated, determined, and cooperative, embodying the can-do spirit required to address the challenges of sustainability and renewable resource-based economies.