Biological age varies among individuals within a population, reflecting differences in aging rates and health status. While the concept of biological age is valuable for understanding aging processes, it’s important to clarify that measurements such as epigenetic clocks do not directly represent biological age. This distinction is crucial as biological aging is a complex, multifaceted phenomenon that cannot be captured by a single metric. To avoid confusion, researchers should specify the type of output generated by aging clocks, such as epigenetic age or transcriptomic age. By accurately labeling aging biomarkers and emphasizing their role as indicators of biological age, we can enhance clarity in scientific discourse and public understanding. Learn more about this topic at: https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.14377.