Helene and Milton, the two devastating hurricanes that recently hit the country, resulting in tragic loss of life and widespread destruction, have emerged as an unexpected October surprise. The aftermath of these storms has not only left a trail of devastation but has also sparked discussions of political change in seven states. Surprisingly, even in the wake of these natural disasters, climate change has not taken center stage in the current presidential campaign.
With the upcoming election drawing near and voters tasked with choosing between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, both of whom hold differing views on climate change, it is crucial to consider the potential impact of their policies on the environment. The next four years will be pivotal for the nation’s progress on critical climate goals, including reducing greenhouse gas emissions and transitioning to a carbon-free economy.
As voters prepare to cast their ballots, Grist’s editorial staff presents a climate-focused voter’s guide, offering insights and predictions on how the next administration may shape the country’s environmental policies. From energy production to home improvements, and transportation initiatives, the decisions made by the incoming president will have far-reaching consequences for climate action and environmental sustainability.
The federal government plays a significant role in influencing how utilities meet electricity demand and promote clean energy alternatives. While President Trump advocates for increased fossil fuel production, Vice President Harris has shown some support for renewable energy sources, albeit with some exceptions. The choice of leadership will determine the trajectory of the nation’s energy mix and its impact on climate change.
Additionally, policies related to home improvements and incentives for decarbonization, such as the Inflation Reduction Act, differ between the candidates. Trump’s pledge to rescind funding for energy-efficient home improvements contrasts with Harris’ support for such initiatives, indicating a potential shift in priorities depending on the election outcome.
Furthermore, the rising costs of home insurance premiums due to extreme weather events underscore the urgent need for climate resilience strategies. While Harris acknowledges the impact of climate change on insurance markets, Trump’s proposed actions could have lasting repercussions for homeowners in vulnerable areas.
In the transportation sector, the disparities between Harris and Trump’s approaches to infrastructure spending and promotion of electric vehicles highlight the diverging paths the country could take in combating climate change. The decisions made in the next administration will significantly influence the transition to a more sustainable transportation system.
In conclusion, the choices made in the upcoming election will shape the country’s response to climate change and its commitment to a greener future. As voters evaluate the candidates’ climate and environment-related policies, it is essential to consider the long-term implications of their decisions on the planet and future generations. Make an informed decision when you cast your vote.
